E-ISSN 2577-2058
 
2024, Vol: 10, Issue: 1
10 / 1Current Issue Online FirstAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Cover Letter

Original Article

Online Publishing Date:
05 / 01 / 2022



Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study

Emre Can Çelebioğlu, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Ayça Koca, Evren Özçınar, Levent Yazıcıoğlu.


Abstract
Background:
The purpose of this study is to assess the success and complication rates of two different techniques used for retrograde femoral artery access.
Methods:
This retrospective study included angiographies performed by a retrograde femoral artery access. Arterial punctures were performed with either ultrasound guided (group 1) or manual palpation (group 2) methods. Patient pulses were examined by a nurse practitioner and graded subjectively before preparing the puncture side (grade 0-3). The puncture side (right or left femoral), complications, average catheterization time calculated from patient notes, first pass success rate, and the number of puncture attempts were analyzed. Sheath sizes, BMI, vascular closure device usage after the angiographic procedure were also recorded and analyzed.
Results:
A total of 256 angiographies found to be eligible; age, pulse grading, and puncture side distributions were similar (p > 0.05). Mean puncture attempts to catheterize femoral arteries were 1.09 ± 0.09 and 1.25 ± 0.24 times, which took 1.49 ± 0.19 and 1.75 ± 0.25 mins for group 1 and group 2, respectively, which were statistically significant (p<0.001). Complication rates were similar for both groups (p=0.561) and increased with BMI>35 (p=0.003).
Conclusion:
Ultrasound guidance is comparable with manual palpation method and somewhat better in certain conditions. Thus should be considered as an option during routine retrograde femoral artery access. According to our results, even in arteries with strong pulse first-pass success rate, average catheterization time, and puncture attempts were better with ultrasound guidance.

Key words: Ultrasound guided femoral artery catheterization, manual palpation method, retrograde femoral artery puncture, vascular closure device, inguinal ligament


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Emre Can Çelebioğlu
Articles by Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu
Articles by Ayça Koca
Articles by Evren Özçınar
Articles by Levent Yazıcıoğlu
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Celebioğlu EC, MCS, AK, EO, LY, . Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. A J Diagn Imaging. 2022; 8(1): 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917

Web Style

Celebioğlu EC, MCS, AK, EO, LY, . Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. https://www.scopub.com/ajdi/?mno=18927 [Access: February 22, 2024]. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Celebioğlu EC, MCS, AK, EO, LY, . Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. A J Diagn Imaging. 2022; 8(1): 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Celebioğlu EC, MCS, AK, EO, LY, . Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. A J Diagn Imaging. (2022), [cited February 22, 2024]; 8(1): 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


Harvard Style

Celebioğlu, E. C., , M. C. S., , A. K., , E. O., , L. Y. & (2022) Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. A J Diagn Imaging, 8 (1), 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


Turabian Style

Celebioğlu, Emre Can, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Ayca Koca, Evren Ozcınar, Levent Yazıcıoğlu, and . 2022. Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging , 8 (1), 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


Chicago Style

Celebioğlu, Emre Can, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Ayca Koca, Evren Ozcınar, Levent Yazıcıoğlu, and . "Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study." American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 8 (2022), 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Celebioğlu, Emre Can, Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Ayca Koca, Evren Ozcınar, Levent Yazıcıoğlu, and . "Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study." American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 8.1 (2022), 1-5. Print. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Celebioğlu, E. C., , M. C. S., , A. K., , E. O., , L. Y. & (2022) Comparison of Ultrasound Guided and Manual Palpation Methods in Retrograde Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Retrospective Study. American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging , 8 (1), 1-5. doi:10.5455/ajdi.20211122072917


Author LoginReviewer LoginAbout PublisherOpen Access PolicyEditorial PoliciesEditorial Review PolicyPeer Review PolicyEditorial & Peer Review ProcessPublication Ethics and Publication Malpractice StatementConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyProtection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Privacy PolicyCorrections, Retractions & Expressions of ConcernSelf-Archiving PoliciesDigital Archiving & Preservation PoliciesAdvertising PolicyTerms of UseLicense InformationCopyright Information

About American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging

The main aim of our journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information

Your comments are very important to us

We welcome your ideas, suggestions, comments, or questions. To reach Editorial Board please use one of the methods provided below.
 

Emails:

info@scopub.com
editorinchief@ejmanager.com

Office Address:
14 Rue de Grand-Bigard,
1082 Brussels
Belgium
 
We will respond within 48 to 72 hours.
 
Change of address or personal information? Please visit your account at www.ejmanager.com to update your information.